The program of future Labor candidates has become a source of controversy within the party today, after it was reported Hundreds of people who may never have been members are encouraged to apply. A Labor source said The times that Keir Starmer “wants to open up the party,” making it “more representative and less obsessed with internal issues,” while a Labor whistleblower cited concerns about the “caliber” of Labor candidates in the 2019 election and the need to “be pro-Starmer people ”in parliament as a key driver.
The program was first launched by Ed Miliband in 2011. Jon Trickett MP said at the time: “We have to convince people that if a democracy really works, then people like us can become members of parliament.” Miliband had asked him to find more candidates from the working class. Similarly, the program was launched this time as a way to create “a skilled cohort of individuals who reflect the full diversity of our society.”
But the aspect of the program that worries some is that there are “There is no limit on the duration of membership” for applicants. This appear to undermine Labor regulations, which state that candidates must be party members for at least one year before running for office (although exceptions are sometimes made, as in the case of Kim Leadbeater). LaborList However, you can clarify that the one-year rule will still apply to selections. The program is waived because the party does not know when the next general election will be, probably not in the next 12 months, and participation in the course does not guarantee selection as a candidate anyway.
A Labor spokesman said LaborList: “The Future Candidates Program is an important part of our commitment to present a diverse group of candidates across the country in the upcoming general elections. To achieve this, and as we do not know when the next elections will be, we have opened the participation of the course to include any member of the party. The normal requirements to apply as a candidate are maintained. “
There will be frustration for the original quote in The times criticizing the addition of Labor MPs in 2019, however, as many of the newcomers have come through affiliated unions. A Unite the Union spokesperson reacted to the news by describing the Labor Party as “full of talented people who have dedicated themselves to their party, their union or public service” and said the comment on the 2019 candidates was “disrespectful snobbery towards people who give their all for work ”.
More generally, the unions will not be happy if the selection possibilities of their members are reduced in favor of people who have given little money to the party and little time to the labor movement. This sentiment is also likely to be shared by members of the Labor national executive committee who support the leadership, as many will have connections to aspiring MPs or will want to be MPs themselves.
The belief that there is a lack of talent in the Parliamentary Labor Party is not limited to a single faction, and it is not just Starmer supporters who want to see improvements in the selections. But the concern of the Labor left is that the goal here is to bring in loyal leaders with minimal commitment to Labor and minimal experience, which would not address the quality issue. (Momentum has sent an email today to its own members encouraging them to apply to the show before the deadline on Friday, August 13 at 5 p.m.).
A pro-leadership source suggested LaborList that a better solution would be to avoid obvious problems, such as the one seen in Hartlepool, as this could encourage people to stand up. Clearly, something is wrong when the quality of counseling requests is generally much higher than the quality of PM requests, as is apparently the case.
The consequence of allowing very new party members to join the program of future Labor candidates is not that the normal requirements to run are removed. But opening the scheme in this way means applicants are more likely to be loyal to the leadership, making it an effort to shape the parliamentary party in Starmer’s favor. This is sure to attract criticism from your detractors. The question is whether the program will really improve the quality of Labor candidates, rather than just the position of one faction.
Do you value our free and unique service?
LabourList has more readers than ever, but we need your support. Our dedicated coverage of Labor politics and personalities, internal debates, selections and elections is based on donations from our readers.