Democrats are trying to make roads and bridges an important campaign theme ahead of the 2022 mid-term elections, highlighting local projects that will benefit from the bipartisan infrastructure bill and pursuing republicans who voted against.
“We cannot forget that the senior senator of our state, Marco Rubio, fought this effort. … Voted against economic opportunity and relief, “Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.), Who is racing to unseat Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Said Wednesday at a panel discussion. small business in Florida.
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which is pending signature by President Joe Biden, will make the largest investment in the American infrastructure system in decades, creating jobs and strengthening the economy in the process. The money – $ 1.2 trillion over eight years – is aimed at overhauling the nation’s roads, bridges, railways, ports, utilities, internet access, and more.
The measure is also a political advantage for Democrats, especially after last week’s out-of-year election defeats in Virginia and New Jersey, where Republicans made big gains. It’s one they hope will cushion their incumbents against other economic headaches like inflation and supply chain problems.
Lawmakers and Democratic candidates now look forward to issuing positive press releases and attending ribbon-cutting ceremonies for local infrastructure projects. Bringing home bacon is more popular than ever with members of Congress, and lawmakers wasted no time in publicizing their work on the bill this week.
“The passage of the bipartisan infrastructure package is a real game changer for New Hampshire,” he said at a news conference at the Amoskeag Bridge in Manchester on Tuesday. “Investments in this bill will pave the way for the creation of new jobs, help our economy thrive and outpace competition from China.”
However, Democrats may have a hard time demonstrating the effects of the bill to voters right away. It takes time to build things like roads and bridges, and in some cases even longer for the federal government to award contracts. But the payoff could continue across the board.
In the Senate, 19 Republicans voted in favor of the bill, no small feat in today’s polarized climate. The group included Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Who called the bill a “manna from heaven“For his state.
The incumbent GOP senators targeted by the Democrats – Rubio in Florida and Ron Johnson in Wisconsin – opposed the measure. So did most of the Republican candidates in Ohio, Pennsylvania and North Carolina, the three seats opened in the Senate next year, and the Republican candidates trying to oust the Democrats in Georgia, Arizona and Nevada.
“Republicans will have to explain why they oppose the creation of higher-paying jobs and investment in their states’ roads, bridges, clean water and high-speed Internet,” said Jazmin Vargas, spokesperson for the Committee on Democratic Senatorial Campaign. a declaration. “And in 2022, voters will hold GOP Senate candidates accountable for prioritizing their own selfish policies at the expense of working families.”
In the House, only 13 Republicans walked through their aisle and voted for the bill. Some of them are now coping death threats on their votes, as well as the allegations of treason by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. The incendiary deputy from Georgia tweeted the office phone numbers of his colleagues who supported the legislation, urging his followers to vent their frustration.
The remarkable thing about the split in the party on a popular issue like infrastructure is that Republicans continue to take a cue from former President Donald Trump, who proposed a major infrastructure overhaul when he ran for president, but ultimately abandoned those. efforts in office.
Trump over the weekend criticized Republicans in the House and Senate who voted for the bill for giving Biden a political victory.
“Very sad that the RINOs in the House and Senate gave Biden and the Democrats a victory over the ‘non-infrastructure’ bill,” Trump said in a statement Sunday. “All Republicans who voted for Democratic longevity should be ashamed, especially Mitch McConnell, for granting a two-month stay that allowed the Democrats time to fix things at the expense of our country and the Republican party!”