The University of Cincinnati has now withdrawn its formal rebuke of professor Melanie Nipper, who failed a student in her class for using the term “biological female” during an assignment on trans women in sports.
The rebuke was issued less than a month ago, on June 14, by the head of UC’s Department of Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies, but has since been expunged from Nipper’s personnel file.
The formal warning was removed after Professor Nipper appealed to the University, which later decided that her warning had been ‘issued in error’.
However, Nipper, 28, has yet to receive training on the university’s free speech policy and submit the course syllabus to the department head.
Nipper, an adjunct professor, took issue with student Olivia Krolczyk’s use of the term in an essay on the controversial topic.
The University of Cincinnati has revoked its rebuke of professor Melanie Nipper, 28, who suspended a student for using the term ‘biological female’ in an assignment.
The student he failed, Olivia Krolczyk, shared her disappointment with UC’s latest decision in a new TikTok video indicating how the educational establishment showed disregard for students’ rights to free speech.
Nipper told her that ‘the terms ‘biological women’ are exclusive and not allowed in this course, as they further reinforce heteronormativity.
‘Please re-rate your topic and edit it to focus on women’s rights (not just ‘women’) and I’ll rate again.’
In challenging his reprimand, Nipper had argued that failing the student did not violate UC’s free speech policy.
The student he failed, Krolczyk, shared his disappointment with UC’s latest decision and took to TikTok, stating that the educational establishment showed disregard for students’ rights to free speech and had failed to ensure professional conduct among students. their educators.
“Professor Melanie Nipper and the University of Cincinnati have proven to be very disreputable and unprofessional at this point,” Krolczyk began.
“The school’s decision to rescind this reprimand of Professor Nipper for failing me for saying the word ‘biological’ to describe women just goes to show that the school sets rules and policies, but you don’t actually have to follow them because you won’t have any consequences if you you break the rules
Krolczyk stated that he had little sympathy for the teacher who had revealed herself, later complaining that the episode had caused a “huge emotional impact” on him.
The University of Cincinnati has revoked its reprimand of a professor who suspended a student for using the term ‘biological female’
Krolczyk had revealed in a previous TikTok last month how he received a zero on his project proposal from Nipper on transgender athletes in women’s sports for using the term ‘biological women’.
Nipper told him that the term was exclusive and violated the course guidelines.
“Of course, Melanie Nipper is trying to play the victim card in this situation, which doesn’t surprise me in the least because she’s been pulling this card from the beginning, claiming it was very difficult and she cried when she watched my video even although I never said the name of the class, the school, or his name,” Krolczyk continued in his TikTok rant.
‘She is the one who revealed her identity and in doing so she should have been prepared for the consequences of that. I have caused absolutely no harm or threat to you by denouncing the fact that you took very unfair and extreme actions,” Krolczyk continued.
“It is not white supremacy to denounce the very true fact that a man will never be a woman and should not compete in women’s sports because that would be actively taking away women’s rights and opportunities.
Krolczyk now has 14,000 followers on Twitter and is using her social media accounts to campaign against trans women in sport and has also created her own clothing line to push her point.
Olivia Krolczyk criticized both the professor and the university for their actions on her latest TikTok
Krolczyk made a similar statement on Twitter to the one in his TikTok video.
“It’s extremely disappointing to see that there are women who are actually contributing to erasing themselves,” Krolczyk concluded.
Krolczyk’s initial TikTok May video of the incident is what garnered his national attention. Since then, the clip has been viewed more than a million times.
While Krolczyk eventually received a new grade and completed the class with an A, Nipper had initially been reprimanded for violating school policy.
This decision follows an ongoing debate about free speech and inclusive language in academic settings.
Krolczyk now has 14,000 followers on Twitter and is using her social media accounts to campaign against trans women in sport and take a stance on LGBTQ controversies.
She has also created her own clothing line to further her point of view: TheBiologicalWoman.com.
Melanie Nipper, an adjunct professor at the University of Cincinnati, reversed her rebuke
Olivia Krolczyk said in May that she was given a zero for her use of the term “biological women” in her Gender Studies of Women in Pop Culture class.
When a student uses ‘outdated terminology,’ Nipper added about the zero mark (seen here with an explanation attached), they will always take that opportunity to correct those errors.
In Nipper’s earlier rebuke, a The university document says: ‘Please note that this should be considered a formal reprimand for your actions.
‘A copy of this letter will be placed in your permanent records. It is also understood that any other violation of UC policy may be subject to additional disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.
‘You are reminded that as an unclassified and unrepresented ‘at-will’ employee, your employment may be terminated with or without cause.’
The letter also required that he “must complete training on campus Free Speech Policy requirements” and “submit all syllabuses” for review and approval “at least two weeks prior to the start of classes.” .
Nipper defended his actions before the university.
Nipper had remained defiant, insisting that he was correct in marking the role of Krolczyk.
Krolczyk has now become an activist, campaigning online on LGBTQ issues.
She told them that ‘my restriction on harmful language’ was ‘necessary to ensure a safe learning environment in course discussions and for the pedagogical purpose of teaching WGSS introductory theory’.
She said she teaches from an “intersectional, fourth-wave, and transnational feminist perspective,” arguing that the student’s chosen topic for her project was “inappropriate as it targeted trans women as a source of oppression for cis women in the world.” sports’.
Nipper added: “I felt it was necessary to educate her on inclusive language to ensure a safe learning environment for other students in the course discussion forums.”
Kid He said his support for free speech ends when “you are, intentionally or unintentionally, engaging in systemic harm of some kind,” including statements he considers transphobic or racist.
She said her correction of Krolczyk’s work was fair.
‘Not a zero for the course, a zero for an assignment,’ he explained.
Source: | This article originally belongs to Dailymail.co.uk
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24742194/350457055_218583294315389_8997521909640967870_n.jpg)